
No big link today, just some idle musing on the use of “Limousine Liberal” as an epithet. What’s wrong with someone in a limo being a liberal? If I do win the lottery, and I decide to add a limo to my lottery garage, am I supposed to change my worldview for some reason? What’s the logic (or should I say “logic”) behind that?
Maybe it’s used as an epithet because people think there’s some implied hypocrisy — as if liberalism is somehow anti-rich, or anti-being-rich. I’m not aware of any actual liberals that have that attitude. Sure, liberals often favor some redistribution of wealth, but I’ve never met anyone who thinks nobody should be rich.
People who think a liberal in a limo is a hypocrite are probably the same folks who think Al Gore is a hypocrite just because he doesn’t live in a mud hut and use a bicycle-powered generator to run the computer he uses to surf the Internet (which, by the way, he never claimed he invented).
Or maybe people think they’re traitors to their class — that rich people should feel some responsibility to stand up for rich people against those poor people (sort of the way white supremacists refer to white non-supremacists as “race traitors”). I guess that’s why such people are always tut-tutting about “Class Warfare.”
Funny how people who are otherwise hawkish suddenly turn into “Kumbayah”-singing hippies when faced with the prospect of “warfare” that might actually affect them. I guess when someone above you is pissing on your head, that’s called “the free market.” When you say “hey, stop pissing on my head!” that’s called “class warfare.”
(limo pic via A1 Executive Limousines)
Read Full Post »